doc: codify upstream contribution and review conventions - #1
Open
moliholy wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR:
indico/AGENTS.mdcovering commit and title styles, changelog duties, a database checklist, comment policy, architecture expectations, plugin rules, testing, and review flow for PRs against the upstream Indico repositories.CODING_GUIDELINES.mdwith the*_test.pynaming default, access-matrix coverage for new endpoints, a client-side tests subsection, docstring contracts, merge-strategy-aware commits, and richer PR description conventions.AGENTS.mdwith orphan cleanup and requirement-surface checks, and allows multi-line why-comments about external-service quirks.bump-indico-submoduleskill.