feat(mcp): add remote + stdio surfaces for loopover_get_ams_miner_cohort

[RealDiligent]

Summary

• Closes loopover_get_ams_miner_cohort has a REST route but no remote MCP tool or local stdio MCP tool #7797: register loopover_get_ams_miner_cohort on the remote MCP server and local stdio bin (mirror loopover_get_maintainer_noise auth + buildAmsMinerCohortComparison), with authorized / forbidden coverage.
• In-process bin coverage via exported server + InMemoryTransport (same pattern as recent merged MCP parity PRs).

Test plan

• vitest mcp-cli-ams-miner-cohort + mcp-output-schemas + mcp-tool-rename-aliases
• CI validate / validate-tests green
• codecov/patch not 0% on bin-only lines

Made with Cursor

[superagent-security]

Superagent didn't find any vulnerabilities or security issues in this PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 27.27273% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 80.77%. Comparing base (03f9d9c) to head (315f8dc).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/mcp/server.ts	25.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
packages/loopover-mcp/bin/loopover-mcp.ts	33.33%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7930      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.84%   80.77%   -1.08%     
==========================================
  Files         731       90     -641     
  Lines       74928    24446   -50482     
  Branches    22852     4701   -18151     
==========================================
- Hits        61328    19746   -41582     
+ Misses      10914     4458    -6456     
+ Partials     2686      242    -2444     

Flag	Coverage Δ
shard-1	22.80% <27.27%> (-37.08%)	⬇️
shard-2	22.21% <27.27%> (-30.47%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
packages/loopover-mcp/bin/loopover-mcp.ts	13.93% <33.33%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
src/mcp/server.ts	56.47% <25.00%> (-25.87%)	⬇️

... and 641 files with indirect coverage changes

[loopover-orb]

Caution

🛑 LoopOver review result - fixes required

_{Review updated: 2026-07-21 19:11:14 UTC}

7 files · no blockers · CI failing · blocked

🛑 Suggested Action - Fix Blockers

• AI review already in progress for this PR head: Another LoopOver pass is already running the AI review for this exact PR head. This pass is skipping to avoid a duplicate LLM call.

Review summary
AI review is already running for this PR head in another LoopOver pass. LoopOver is holding this PR for manual review until that pass completes.

Nits — 2 non-blocking

• AI review already in progress for this PR head — The gate is held for a human reviewer rather than passed automatically; it re-evaluates once the in-flight review completes or on the next update.
• Possible secret-shaped assignment in the diff (generic_secret_assignment) — Verify the value is not a real credential.

CI checks failing

• codecov/patch — 27.27% of diff hit (target 99.00%)
• validate
• validate-tests (3)

Decision drivers

• ✅ Code review — No blockers (No AI review summary)
• ⚠️ Gate result — Not blocking (Advisory; not blocking this PR.)

Context & advisory signals — never blocks the verdict

Signal	Result	Evidence
Linked issue	✅ Linked	#7797
Related work	✅ No active overlap found	No same-issue or scoped active PR overlap found.
Change scope	✅ 20/20	Low review scope from cached public metadata (1 linked issue).
Validation posture	✅ 25/25	PR body includes validation/test evidence.
Contributor workload	✅ 10/10	Author activity: 393 registered-repo PR(s), 176 merged, 36 issue(s).
Contributor context	✅ Confirmed Gittensor contributor	RealDiligent; Gittensor profile; 393 PR(s), 36 issue(s).
Improvement	✅ Minor	risk: clean · value: minor

Review context

• Author: RealDiligent
• Role context: outside_contributor
• Public audience mode: oss maintainer
• Lane context: Repository is configured for direct PR review.
• Public profile languages: not available
• Official Gittensor activity: 393 PR(s), 36 issue(s).
• PR-specific overlap: none found.

Contributor next steps

• Keep the PR focused and include validation evidence before maintainer review.

Signal definitions

• Related work = same linked issue, overlapping active PRs, or title/path similarity.
• Change scope = cached public metadata such as size labels, draft state, and review-burden hints.
• Validation posture = whether the PR provides enough public validation/test evidence for maintainer review.
• Contributor workload = public contributor activity and cleanup pressure, not a repo-wide quality failure.
• Contributor context = public GitHub/Gittensor identity context; non-Gittensor status is not a blocker.

🧪 Chat with LoopOver

Ask LoopOver a question about this PR directly in a comment — grounded only in the same cached, public-safe facts shown above, never a new claim.

• @loopover ask <question> answers contribution-quality Q&A with source citations and freshness.
• @loopover chat <question> answers in natural prose from cached decision-pack facts via local inference (maintainer/collaborator; read-only).
• A plain-language @loopover mention with a real question is routed to the closest matching read-only command automatically — no exact syntax required.

Full command reference: https://loopover.ai/docs/loopover-commands

🧪 Experimental — new and may change.

_{🟩 Safe / merged · 🟦 Advisory · 🟨 Held for review · 🟥 Blocked / closed}

---

💰 Earn for open-source contributions like this. Gittensor lets GitHub contributors earn for the work they already do — register to start earning →.

Checked by LoopOver, a quiet PR intelligence layer for OSS maintainers.

• Re-run LoopOver review

[loopover-orb]

LoopOver is closing this pull request on the maintainer's behalf (CI is failing (codecov/patch, validate, validate-tests (3))). This is an automated maintenance action — to pursue this change, please open a new pull request with the issues resolved. Closed PRs may be analyzed later to improve review accuracy, but they are not automatically reopened or re-reviewed.