Skip to content

feat(nano): operational constraint-checklist verification guideline (PR 19) - #898

Merged
agentforce314 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/nano-constraint-checklist
Aug 16, 2026
Merged

feat(nano): operational constraint-checklist verification guideline (PR 19)#898
agentforce314 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/nano-constraint-checklist

Conversation

@agentforce314

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Four of nine completed-wrong v2 tasks were one-assertion near-misses on constraints stated in the task (wrong source archive, Tm 6.5°C vs ≤5°C, entity mutation, untested CLI output). The verification bullet now prescribes the method: list the task's explicit requirements and constraints, test the artifact against each. General skill; +~25 est. tokens.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Four of the nine completed-wrong tasks in tb21-nano-flash-max-2 were
one-assertion near-misses, each violating a constraint stated in the
task text that the agent never tested: build-pov-ray built from the
wrong source archive (2/3 tests green), dna-insert's primer Tm delta
was 6.5°C against a stated ≤5°C bound, filter-js-from-html claimed
'fully verified' while mutating clean HTML entities, pytorch-model-cli
passed 5/6 with an untested CLI output format. The bullet now names the
method — extract the task's explicit requirements AND constraints
(formats, tolerances, numeric bounds, required sources/methods) into a
list and test the artifact against each — rather than only the
principle. TB verifiers are hidden, so self-verification against the
stated constraints is the only available check; this is the general
skill, not benchmark knowledge.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@agentforce314
agentforce314 merged commit 9ea3fa8 into main Aug 16, 2026
agentforce314 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2026
fxinfo24 pushed a commit to fxinfo24/clawcodex that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2026
…nano-constraint-checklist"

This reverts commit 9ea3fa8, reversing
changes made to 6792ace.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant