Skip to content

[release-4.22]AGENT-1548: Backport NoRegistryClusterInstall feature to release-4.22 - #6323

Open
bfournie wants to merge 14 commits into
openshift:release-4.22from
bfournie:backport-iri-to-release-4.22
Open

[release-4.22]AGENT-1548: Backport NoRegistryClusterInstall feature to release-4.22#6323
bfournie wants to merge 14 commits into
openshift:release-4.22from
bfournie:backport-iri-to-release-4.22

Conversation

@bfournie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport the following PRs:
#5765
#5721
#6003
#6041
#6070
#5988
#5841
#6100
#6109
#6146
#6145
#6159
#6280

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

openshift-merge-bot Bot and others added 13 commits July 15, 2026 12:40
AGENT-1449: Add IRI registry authentication support to MCO
 AGENT-1443: IRI Add certificate regeneration to MCS cert rotation controller
AGENT-1514: Add ML-KEM verification test for IRI registry
…-service

AGENT-1517: disable iri-registry service on IRI delete
AGENT-1491: reclaim disk space from the node when IRI resource is deleted
AGENT-1488: Aggregate IRI status from MachineConfigNodes
OCPBUGS-86671: Fix InternalReleaseImage URL transform
…-auth

AGENT-1526: disable htpasswd auth on IRI registry, keep read-only
…domain

AGENT-1531: Remove localhost.localdomain workaround for MCN IRI image field
…ests

AGENT-1517: avoid running IRI deletion tests for standard e2e IRI tests
AGENT-1517: move helpers in iri e2e main test
@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 20, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bfournie: This pull request references AGENT-1500 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Backport the following PRs:
#5765
#5721
#6003
#6041
#6070
#5988
#5841
#6100
#6109
#6146
#6145
#6159
#6280

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 51ef5107-8e9c-4ffe-b045-7aff932f9446

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@bfournie bfournie changed the title AGENT-1500: Backport InternalReleaseImage changes to release 4.22 AGENT-1548: Backport InternalReleaseImage changes to release 4.22 Jul 20, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bfournie: This pull request references AGENT-1548 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Backport the following PRs:
#5765
#5721
#6003
#6041
#6070
#5988
#5841
#6100
#6109
#6146
#6145
#6159
#6280

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@bfournie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bfournie: This pull request references AGENT-1548 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from andfasano and djoshy July 20, 2026 16:32
@bfournie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test unit

@bfournie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test unit
Looks like a flake unrelated to the changes.

@bfournie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test unit

1 similar comment
@bfournie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test unit

@bfournie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test ?

@bfournie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test e2e-agent-compact-ipv4-iso-no-registry

1 similar comment
@bfournie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test e2e-agent-compact-ipv4-iso-no-registry

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 23, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduling tests matching the pipeline_run_if_changed or not excluded by pipeline_skip_if_only_changed parameters:
/test e2e-aws-ovn
/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-gcp-op-ocl-part1
/test e2e-gcp-op-ocl-part2
/test e2e-gcp-op-part1
/test e2e-gcp-op-part2
/test e2e-gcp-op-single-node
/test e2e-hypershift

@pawanpinjarkar

pawanpinjarkar commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retitle [release-4.22]AGENT-1548: Backport NoRegistryClusterInstall feature to release-4.22

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot changed the title AGENT-1548: Backport InternalReleaseImage changes to release 4.22 [release-4.22]AGENT-1548: Backport NoRegistryClusterInstall feature to release-4.22 Jul 23, 2026
@bfournie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@yuqi-zhang yuqi-zhang left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Logically seems fine - I think this is only "missing" #6119 - would probably be nice to have.

If both core MCO tests are fine, and it's passing your install job, this should be safe to merge

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 27, 2026
NO-ISSUE: Lower IRI deletion log verbosity
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Jul 27, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 27, 2026
@andfasano

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 27, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduling tests matching the pipeline_run_if_changed or not excluded by pipeline_skip_if_only_changed parameters:
/test e2e-aws-ovn
/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-gcp-op-ocl-part1
/test e2e-gcp-op-ocl-part2
/test e2e-gcp-op-part1
/test e2e-gcp-op-part2
/test e2e-gcp-op-single-node
/test e2e-hypershift

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andfasano, bfournie, yuqi-zhang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@bfournie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Logically seems fine - I think this is only "missing" #6119 - would probably be nice to have.

If both core MCO tests are fine, and it's passing your install job, this should be safe to merge

Good idea, added #6119. Would you be able to add the backport-risk-assessed label and also set the jira/valid-bug since this is using an SBAR and not OCPBUGS? Thanks.

@bfournie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test e2e-agent-compact-ipv4-iso-no-registry

@bfournie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@ptalgulk01 I updated the PR so those jobs may need to be deployed again. Thank you.

@bfournie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test e2e-agent-compact-ipv4-iso-no-registry

@andfasano

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Logically seems fine - I think this is only "missing" #6119 - would probably be nice to have.
If both core MCO tests are fine, and it's passing your install job, this should be safe to merge

Good idea, added #6119. Would you be able to add the backport-risk-assessed label and also set the jira/valid-bug since this is using an SBAR and not OCPBUGS? Thanks.

cc @yuqi-zhang

@bfournie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/verified by ci/prow/e2e-agent-compact-ipv4-iso-no-registry

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Jul 28, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bfournie: This PR has been marked as verified by ci/prow/e2e-agent-compact-ipv4-iso-no-registry.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by ci/prow/e2e-agent-compact-ipv4-iso-no-registry

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@bfournie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test unit

@zaneb

zaneb commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Manually adding valid-bug as this is subject to an approved SBAR.

@zaneb zaneb added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jul 28, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bfournie: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/unit eb98061 link true /test unit

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants